Running Back by Committee Explained
It’s understood how essential and crucial a solid run game strategy is for any team, but what does it mean for a team to strategically split the load between multiple backs on a consistent basis? The “running back by committee” (RBBC) approach involves spreading carries and receiving opportunities between multiple running backs within a team.
Let’s discuss, what is running back by committee?
What Does Running Back by Committee Mean?
RBBC is a strategy where teams utilize a rotation of running backs, each with different skillsets like power running or receiving abilities, rather than relying on a single featured back.
Evolution of RBBC
Historically, the NFL has alternated between favoring workhorse backs and RBBC approaches. In recent years, the rise of pass-heavy offenses and concerns over player durability led to a decline in workhorse utilization as teams favor spreading the workload.
However, this workhorse philosophy continues to be employed by some teams. It’s also worth noting that the ability for running backs to reach notable milestones and high rushing yard career numbers are greatly diminished with the implementation of “running back by committee”.
RBBC vs. Workhorse Running Backs
RBBC Advantages:
- Reduces wear-and-tear on individual players
- Keeps backs fresh
- Utilizes specific skillsets
RBBC Disadvantages:
- Inconsistent touches can disrupt rhythm
- Establishing a dominant rushing attack can be harder
Workhorse Back Advantages:
- Develops offensive line chemistry and trust
- Potentially leads to a more dominant rushing attack
Workhorse Disadvantages:
- Increased injury risk
- Fatigue can impact late-game/season performance
Both RBBC and workhorse philosophies have merits in the modern NFL. Team coaching preferences, roster talent, and game plans ultimately dictate which approach is employed. As the league continues to evolve, the future role of RBBC remains an intriguing strategic question.
